ture has shown little interest in the transformation of actors in scientific practice, thus tending to enforce by default an image of their identities as nonemergent and persisting unchanged through practice.
More Books:
Language: en
Pages: 296
Pages: 296
This ambitious book by one of the most original and provocative thinkers in science studies offers a sophisticated new understanding of the nature of scientific, mathematical, and engineering practice and the production of scientific knowledge. Andrew Pickering offers a new approach to the unpredictable nature of change in science, taking
Language: en
Pages: 279
Pages: 279
A unique collection of essays dealing with the intersections between science and mathematics.
Language: en
Pages: 390
Pages: 390
Since the 1950s, many philosophers of science have attacked positivism—the theory that scientific knowledge is grounded in objective reality. Reconstructing the history of these critiques, John H. Zammito argues that while so-called postpositivist theories of science are very often invoked, they actually provide little support for fashionable postmodern approaches to
Language: en
Pages: 352
Pages: 352
This study offers a critical survey of past and present interpretations of the Chemical Revolution designed to lend clarity and direction to the current ferment of views.
Language: en
Pages: 320
Pages: 320
In The Mangle of Practice (1995), the renowned sociologist of science Andrew Pickering argued for a reconceptualization of research practice as a “mangle,” an open-ended, evolutionary, and performative interplay of human and non-human agency. While Pickering’s ideas originated in science and technology studies, this collection aims to extend the mangle’s